321 Benutzer online
31. August 2025, 18:18:19

Windows Community



Neueste Beiträge

Seiten: 1 [3] 5 6 7 8 9 10
21
Off Topic / How to Play Bowling for Beginners: A Community Conversation
« Letzter Beitrag von solutionsitetoto am 21. August 2025, 13:14:02 »
Bowling alleys may look old-fashioned compared to modern gaming centers, but the sport continues to attract newcomers of all ages. It combines friendly competition with a social setting, making it as much about the company as the score. When you first step onto the polished lanes, though, the rules and techniques may feel intimidating. Have you found that bowling feels easier when approached as a social activity rather than a purely competitive one? How did your first experience go?

Learning the Basics of Scoring

At its core, bowling is about knocking down ten pins per frame, with strikes and spares giving you bonus points. Many beginners find the scoring system confusing until they walk through a full game. Guides like Sports Rules & How-To explain how strikes carry over points into the next frame, but understanding it in action makes the most sense. Do you focus on learning the scoring first, or do you prefer just rolling the ball until it starts to feel natural?

Choosing the Right Ball

For a newcomer, selecting a ball can be one of the trickiest parts. Weight, grip size, and comfort all matter. Some say a ball should feel heavy enough to control momentum but not so heavy that it strains your arm. Others argue grip comfort is more important than weight. What works best for you when you’re starting out—do you experiment with different weights, or do you stick to what feels easiest to throw?

Stance and Approach

Every experienced bowler emphasizes stance and rhythm. Beginners often shuffle up too quickly or release too late, leading to gutter balls. Simple advice includes standing tall, aiming at the arrows on the lane rather than the pins, and releasing with a smooth follow-through. But styles vary widely. Have you found a stance or approach that feels more natural than what others recommend? Do you think copying seasoned bowlers helps, or is it better to build your own style over time?

Common Beginner Mistakes

It’s easy to grip the ball too tightly, swing too far, or rush the throw. Many first-time players also forget that consistency matters more than power. Even experienced bowlers admit they spent weeks or months just avoiding the gutters. What mistakes do you remember making when you first started? Which ones still happen, and how do you laugh them off with friends instead of letting them ruin the game?

Bowling Etiquette and Shared Spaces

Beyond technique, bowling has its own etiquette—waiting for the bowler next to you, staying behind the foul line, and respecting lane turns. These unspoken rules create smooth play for everyone. Yet, new players often learn them only by trial and error. How were you introduced to bowling etiquette? Do you think alleys should post clearer reminders for beginners, or does the learning-by-doing method work fine?

Social Play Versus Competitive Play

Some people treat bowling as casual fun with snacks and laughter, while others join leagues and chase high averages. Both approaches have value. What do you enjoy most about the sport—the social banter between frames or the thrill of improving your personal score? If you’ve played in both casual and competitive settings, how do the experiences compare for you?

Staying Safe While Playing

Though bowling looks harmless, injuries can happen—strained wrists, slipped shoes, or even minor falls on slick floors. Beginners are especially vulnerable if they use balls too heavy or ignore basic stretching. There’s also the digital side of safety: online bookings and tournament sign-ups sometimes link to unsafe sites. Tools like globalantiscam remind us to double-check before entering personal details. What safety tips—whether physical or digital—do you think new players overlook most often?

Building Confidence Over Time

Like many activities, bowling rewards patience and practice. Most beginners won’t score high right away, but steady improvement is part of the joy. Watching a strike after a string of misses often feels more satisfying than winning outright. Do you remember the first time you bowled a strike? How did that moment change your confidence in playing?

Inviting Others Into the Game

Bowling is often someone’s first group sport because it welcomes mixed ages and skill levels. Teaching friends or family how to play creates shared memories that last beyond the lanes. Have you ever introduced someone else to bowling? What advice or encouragement did you give them to ease those first few games?

Conclusion: The Ongoing Conversation

Bowling may look like a simple sport, but for beginners, it’s full of lessons about rhythm, patience, and community. Everyone’s first experience is different—some focus on technique, others on laughter, and many balance both. As more people rediscover bowling, the shared wisdom of experienced players becomes invaluable. So, how would you describe your own bowling journey so far? And if a beginner asked you for just one piece of advice before their first roll, what would you say?
22
Off Topic / Building Conversations Around a Betting Review Site
« Letzter Beitrag von totoscamdamage am 21. August 2025, 12:38:58 »
A betting review site isn’t just about ratings—it’s about community knowledge and shared trust. Players often search these sites before joining a platform, hoping to avoid mistakes and find reassurance. When you and I use them, we’re really asking: who else has been here before me, and what did they see? Do you treat review sites as the first step before joining a betting platform, or do you prefer to try a site yourself first?

The Role of Scam Protection

One of the most talked-about features of review platforms is Scam check(먹튀검증). Communities rely on it to separate safe operators from risky ones. A well-run review site acts like a neighborhood watch, raising flags when operators don’t pay out or vanish overnight. But how much trust should we place in these warnings? Do you feel safer when you see a scam alert backed by community reports, or do you still want to verify it elsewhere?

Transparency Versus Promotion

Some review sites share clear evaluation methods, showing how they score betting platforms. Others look more like promotional lists. Reports from americangaming suggest that transparency builds more user confidence than polished marketing. But many players still wonder—are reviews unbiased, or are they influenced by partnerships? What’s your instinct: do you look for a disclosure about affiliations, or do you decide credibility based on the tone of the review itself?

The Power of User Stories

Beyond official ratings, personal stories shape how we judge platforms. A single story of delayed payouts or poor customer service can shift perception more than a dozen positive blurbs. Yet, the risk of fake reviews is real. How do you handle this tension? Do you prefer open forums where anyone can share freely, or do you value moderated spaces where posts are verified but limited?

Comparing Platforms Side by Side

Some review sites add charts, odds comparisons, or payout speed trackers. Others keep things simple with narrative summaries. Which approach helps you more? Do you want quick visuals that summarize differences, or detailed write-ups that explain each feature carefully? Could a mix of both serve different audiences within the same community?

Mobile-First Expectations

With betting now largely mobile, review sites face pressure to adapt. A desktop-friendly review may overlook problems in app design or mobile withdrawals. When you read reviews, do you expect coverage of both desktop and mobile experiences? Or is it enough for you to test the mobile side yourself once you join?

Responsible Play as Part of Reviews

Another conversation within the community is whether review platforms should promote responsible gambling tools. Some players argue that reminders about self-exclusion and deposit limits belong in every review, while others see them as unnecessary distractions. What’s your perspective—should review sites integrate these warnings prominently, or leave them to operators and regulators?

Community-Driven Validation

When many voices align, trust builds. But when feedback is scattered, users struggle to form conclusions. This is why verification through shared experience is so critical. Do you feel more confident when you see consistent themes across reviews, or do you rely on independent data and reports instead? Could review platforms combine both—community voices and industry statistics—to offer balance?

Recognizing Red Flags Together

Everyone spots warning signs differently. For some, overuse of glowing language is suspicious. For others, the lack of regulatory information is the deal-breaker. What red flags do you immediately notice when reading a betting review site? Is it the tone, the missing details, or the absence of user complaints where you’d expect them?

Continuing the Dialogue

At the end of the day, a betting review site becomes more powerful when we engage with it as a community. Reviews alone cannot guarantee safety, but discussions and shared vigilance strengthen our collective understanding. So, how should we move forward? Should we push for more transparency from review platforms, or focus on building stronger community-led verification spaces? And most importantly—how do we, together, make sure the next player finds safer ground than we did?

23
Off Topic / Evaluating Betting Review Sites: A Critical Comparison
« Letzter Beitrag von verficationtoto am 21. August 2025, 12:17:59 »
Betting review sites position themselves as guides to safer online gambling, yet their credibility varies widely. Some operate with transparent criteria, while others appear motivated by affiliation deals rather than user safety. As a reviewer, I believe the critical task is to separate platforms offering real evaluation from those that merely echo promotional material. The differences matter because users rely on these reviews to determine where they place their money and trust.

Criteria for Assessing Credibility

A reliable review site typically demonstrates four qualities: transparent methodology, independent testing, consistent updates, and responsiveness to community feedback. Without these, reviews risk becoming stale or biased. Transparency, for example, means stating whether evaluations stem from firsthand testing or aggregated reports. Updates matter because a sportsbook safe today could change policies overnight. Responsiveness reflects whether the platform incorporates user complaints into its assessments. These standards form the foundation for fair comparison.

Transparency in Methodology

Some review sites outline their testing approach clearly—whether they check payout times, compare odds margins, or audit licensing information. Others remain vague, offering only generic praise without evidence. Vague language without data signals weak credibility. In contrast, when a review explicitly lists withdrawal times, or references regulator verification, readers can cross-check claims. This level of detail separates professional oversight from casual commentary.

Bias and Affiliate Influence

Affiliate-driven bias is one of the most pressing concerns. Many review sites earn commissions when users sign up through referral links. While this practice is common, the problem arises when rankings clearly prioritize financial partnerships over safety. A review site that consistently pushes one brand without acknowledging limitations raises red flags. A credible platform balances affiliate partnerships with honest disclosure, providing both strengths and weaknesses in its reports.

Community-Driven Insights

Community contributions can highlight issues professionals miss. Sites that allow verified user feedback often capture patterns like payout delays or account freezes. References such as Find Trusted Toto Sites Here (토디즈) often highlight the value of curated, community-informed directories. While not flawless, these spaces demonstrate that real user experiences can supplement technical analysis, creating a fuller picture of a betting platform’s reliability.

Security Awareness and Protection

An often-overlooked criterion is whether a review site discusses data protection. In a sector where financial and personal data circulate daily, ignoring security is negligent. The strongest review platforms explain encryption, two-factor authentication, and dispute resolution options. They may also reference broader security solutions like lifelock norton, showing readers how personal data safety extends beyond the betting platform itself. This wider perspective strengthens user protection by connecting site-level checks to broader digital safeguards.

Depth of Coverage Across Operators

Another key factor is scope. Some review sites only cover a handful of well-known sportsbooks, offering surface-level impressions. Others provide deeper dives into both mainstream and niche operators, including lesser-known platforms with strong reliability records. Depth matters because it avoids over-concentration on a few household names, instead presenting users with a variety of choices suited to different betting preferences.

Frequency of Updates

The betting industry evolves quickly—ownership changes, new bonuses emerge, and policies shift. A credible review site must refresh content regularly. Outdated reviews mislead users into thinking a sportsbook is safer or more generous than it currently is. Sites with timestamped updates or rolling review systems demonstrate accountability. By contrast, pages that recycle old information without context risk pushing readers toward stale or even unsafe recommendations.

Balancing Criticism With Recommendation

The goal of a review isn’t only to criticize but to help readers choose. A trustworthy platform balances sharp critique with measured recommendations. It names strong points—fast withdrawals, competitive odds, clear terms—alongside identified risks. This balance gives readers tools to make informed choices without being swayed by marketing gloss or alarmist negativity.

Final Recommendation: What to Look For

After comparing the criteria, I would recommend betting review sites that meet three conditions: they publish transparent methodology, they incorporate verified community feedback, and they maintain timely updates. Platforms failing these tests are unlikely to provide trustworthy guidance. In an industry where financial and personal safety are at stake, the best review sites act as both watchdog and advisor—critical when needed, supportive when warranted.

24
Off Topic / Examining the Role of a Betting Review Site
« Letzter Beitrag von fraudsitetoto am 21. August 2025, 11:54:01 »
A betting review site functions as an intermediary between players and operators. Instead of signing up blindly, users can evaluate platforms through published reviews, rating systems, and comparative breakdowns. According to a survey by the UK Gambling Commission, transparency remains one of the most important factors influencing where individuals choose to wager. Review sites aim to provide that transparency, though the depth and reliability of the data can vary widely.

Evaluating Trust Through Independent Data

Not every review site carries the same weight. A credible one incorporates measurable data, such as payout speeds, licensing jurisdictions, or responsible gambling practices. Academic studies in consumer behavior highlight that quantifiable evidence reduces decision-making uncertainty. In this context, a site offering Essential Online Living Knowledge about platform reliability provides more than opinion—it contributes to informed choice. However, the accuracy of such claims depends on whether the site discloses its methodology.

Balancing Commercial Interests with Objectivity

One of the challenges in analyzing betting review sites lies in their revenue models. Many earn through affiliate partnerships, meaning higher-rated platforms might also be financial partners. Reports from the European Association for the Study of Gambling emphasize that users should approach glowing reviews with cautious interpretation. The presence of commercial bias does not automatically invalidate the review, but it requires careful reading of disclaimers and disclosure statements.

The Importance of Comparative Metrics

When review sites present comparisons, the value comes from standardized metrics. Key factors include licensing bodies, withdrawal times, customer service responsiveness, and available markets. Without such common ground, comparisons risk being more narrative than analytical. A review that quantifies withdrawal speed—such as “processed in about one day on average”—offers more usable insight than one that simply describes it as “fast.”

User Reviews Versus Expert Analysis

Another element worth considering is the balance between user-generated feedback and expert evaluations. While user reviews capture real-world experiences, they can be inconsistent or emotional. Expert reviews, ideally, filter these experiences through structured frameworks. A fair review site blends both perspectives, presenting them side by side. Studies on digital trust consistently show that users seek a mix of peer testimony and professional assessment to build confidence.

Regional Differences and Regulation

Betting review sites often cover international operators, but regulations differ widely between regions. A sportsbook licensed in Malta, for instance, may follow different rules than one in the United Kingdom. This affects how fair play, payouts, and consumer protections are enforced. Outlets such as europeangaming frequently report on how these regulatory differences influence the market. A review site that accounts for these nuances provides a more globally accurate picture, while one that ignores them risks oversimplification.

The Role of Responsible Gambling Measures

A credible review does not only focus on bonuses or odds but also highlights responsible gambling tools. Self-exclusion programs, deposit limits, and age-verification procedures reflect the operator’s commitment to user welfare. Data from the National Council on Problem Gambling suggests that platforms emphasizing these measures reduce risk for players. A betting review site that incorporates these features into its evaluation adds a layer of consumer protection.

The Limitations of Star Ratings

Star ratings are popular because they simplify complex evaluations, but they often mask underlying details. A five-star score could represent quick payouts but poor customer support, or strong odds but limited responsible gambling measures. Research from the Journal of Consumer Research indicates that overly simplified scoring systems can distort decision-making. A balanced review site supplements ratings with detailed explanations, allowing users to interpret scores in context.

Trends in Review Site Reliability

Recent trends point to greater demand for transparency. Some review sites now disclose how many platforms they work with financially, or even include third-party audits of their review criteria. According to Deloitte’s insights on digital markets, transparency fosters trust and long-term engagement. Sites that adopt these practices are more likely to maintain credibility as user awareness grows.

Moving Forward with Cautious Confidence

Betting review sites offer value, but their effectiveness depends on methodology, transparency, and acknowledgment of regulatory differences. For players, the best approach is to use them as one input among many—cross-referencing multiple sources before making a decision. By combining structured comparisons, industry reporting, and personal judgment, you reduce reliance on a single voice. The role of review sites, then, is not to decide for you but to provide clearer ground from which you can make informed choices.

25
Off Topic / Understanding an Online Casino Review Platform: An Educator’s Guide
« Letzter Beitrag von reportotosite am 21. August 2025, 11:03:47 »
An online casino review platform is a digital space where users can access evaluations of different gambling operators. Think of it as a consumer report for casinos—much like how travel sites compare hotels, these platforms compare casinos. They organize information about licensing, games, bonuses, and user complaints, so players don’t have to figure everything out on their own.

Why Casino Safety Matters

Casinos operate in a high-risk environment, where trust is essential. Without proper safeguards, users risk losing not only money but also personal information. This is why resources such as a Casino Safety Guide( 카디즈) exist—to highlight verified and secure options. In simple terms, safety acts like a seatbelt: it doesn’t guarantee there won’t be bumps, but it reduces the chance of serious harm.

How Reviews Are Structured

Most platforms follow a similar format. They outline key criteria such as licensing, payment methods, user interface, game variety, and customer service. Reviews may also include bonus breakdowns, withdrawal speeds, and ongoing promotions. This structure allows readers to compare casinos side by side, just as you might compare product features before making a purchase.

The Role of Licensing and Regulation

Licensing is often the first indicator of legitimacy. A licensed casino has met minimum standards of fairness, transparency, and financial stability. Regulatory bodies act like referees in a game—they enforce rules and penalize misconduct. However, not all referees are equally strict. Review platforms educate readers about which jurisdictions carry stronger oversight and which may be more lenient.

How Review Platforms Simplify Complex Data

The gambling industry can be filled with jargon: RTP percentages, wagering requirements, and compliance audits, to name a few. Review sites translate this into plain language. Instead of overwhelming players with technical detail, they provide summaries and analogies that are easier to grasp. This educational role empowers players to make decisions based on understanding rather than guesswork.

Recognizing Signs of Bias

One challenge is determining whether a review platform is impartial. Some rely heavily on affiliate links, which means they earn revenue if a user clicks through and signs up. While this model isn’t inherently wrong, it can create bias. A good review platform acknowledges this openly. Just as a teacher discloses their sources, transparency helps readers trust the material.

The Value of Independent Industry Insights

Beyond user reviews, industry publications add another layer of knowledge. Outlets like gamingintelligence report on regulation, market shifts, and operator performance. When review platforms cite such sources, it strengthens their credibility. It’s like cross-referencing multiple textbooks—you get a more balanced view of the subject.

Community Feedback and Peer Warnings

Another dimension of review platforms is community input. Real users often share first-hand experiences about delays, disputes, or positive encounters. This peer feedback functions like word of mouth in a classroom—students warn each other about difficult exams or helpful resources. Platforms that highlight complaint trends and resolution rates help others avoid repeating the same mistakes.

Responsible Gambling Tools Explained

A well-rounded review doesn’t just discuss games and bonuses—it highlights responsible gambling measures. Features like deposit limits, cooling-off periods, and self-exclusion options are the equivalent of study aids in education: they help keep learning (or gambling) productive without leading to burnout. By teaching players about these tools, review sites reinforce the idea that safety and enjoyment can go hand in hand.

How to Use a Review Platform Effectively

Understanding how to read and apply reviews is key. Instead of focusing only on flashy bonuses, readers should weigh factors like transparency, user complaints, and licensing. Making a checklist from review insights can serve as a practical decision-making tool. It’s the same as preparing for an exam—you don’t just skim the highlights, you study the parts that matter most.

Conclusion: Learning Before Playing

Online casino review platforms serve as educators in their own right. They simplify complex systems, expose risks, and guide users toward safer choices. By combining structured reviews, peer input, and industry insights, they transform what could be a confusing experience into a more informed process. For any player, the smartest step is to learn first, then play—because understanding is the foundation of safer betting.
26
Hallöchen,
deine Gedanken sind absolut nachvollziehbar, denn bei der Berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung (BU) oder Dienstunfähigkeitsversicherung (DU) hängt sehr viel davon ab, wie du die ersten Schritte angehst. Besonders wenn Vorerkrankungen oder risikorelevante Hobbys im Spiel sind, ist eine anonyme Risikovoranfrage ein sinnvoller und oft sogar notwendiger Schritt. Damit kannst du dir eine Einschätzung der Versicherer einholen, ohne dass gleich ein offizieller Antrag mit allen Folgen gestellt wird.Ein hilfreicher Überblick dazu findet sich hier: https://www.ufkb.de/blog/risikovoranfrage-bu-du. Dort wird genau erklärt, in welchen Situationen eine solche Anfrage sinnvoll ist – zum Beispiel bei chronischen Erkrankungen, psychischen Belastungen oder sportlichen Aktivitäten mit erhöhtem Risiko. Der große Vorteil liegt darin, dass du keine negativen Einträge in der HIS-Datenbank riskierst, falls ein Versicherer deine Anfrage ablehnt.Die Praxis zeigt, dass die Antworten der Versicherer auf dieselbe Anfrage enorm variieren können. Manche Gesellschaften reagieren sehr streng, andere sind wesentlich offener. Durch die anonyme Anfrage lassen sich diese Unterschiede vorab erkennen, und du kannst dann den Anbieter auswählen, der für deine Situation am besten passt. Auf der verlinkten Seite findest du auch konkrete Beispiele, die diesen Unterschied sehr deutlich machen.Wichtig ist außerdem, dass du bei einer solchen Anfrage keine rechtlichen Nachteile hast. Es handelt sich eben nicht um einen Antrag, sondern lediglich um eine unverbindliche Einschätzung. Dadurch bleibt deine Ausgangslage für künftige Anträge unberührt. Besonders bei heiklen Vorerkrankungen wie Rückenproblemen, Asthma oder auch psychischen Diagnosen ist das ein klarer Vorteil.Ein weiterer Punkt ist, dass du diese Voranfrage nicht allein stellen solltest. Fachlich versierte Makler oder Berater wissen genau, wie die Gesundheitsangaben formuliert werden müssen, damit es keine Missverständnisse gibt. Auch darauf wird in dem Artikel hingewiesen, und es gibt Tipps, wie du dich am besten vorbereitest.Zusammengefasst: Eine anonyme Risikovoranfrage lohnt sich immer dann, wenn du gesundheitliche Vorgeschichten hast oder dir unsicher bist, wie dein Beruf oder Hobby von den Versicherern eingestuft wird. Sie schützt dich vor unnötigen Ablehnungen und gibt dir Transparenz über deine tatsächlichen Chancen. Damit gehst du auf Nummer sicher und kannst eine fundierte Entscheidung für deine Absicherung treffen.
27
Off Topic / Re: Wann ist eine anonyme Risikovoranfrage bei einer BU oder DU sinnvoll?
« Letzter Beitrag von Yoyo am 20. August 2025, 12:57:32 »
wer kann helfen?
28
Off Topic / Wann ist eine anonyme Risikovoranfrage bei einer BU oder DU sinnvoll?
« Letzter Beitrag von Yoyo am 20. August 2025, 12:55:27 »
Hallo zusammen,

ich befasse mich derzeit intensiv mit dem Thema Berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung, weil ich mir langfristig einen zuverlässigen Schutz aufbauen möchte. Je mehr ich darüber lese, desto mehr Fragen tauchen allerdings auf. Besonders der Punkt, wie man mit Vorerkrankungen umgeht, macht mir Sorgen. Ich habe gehört, dass falsche Angaben oder auch unklare Formulierungen im Antrag schwerwiegende Folgen haben können.

Gleichzeitig lese ich immer wieder, dass es große Unterschiede zwischen den Versicherern gibt, wenn es um die Einschätzung bestimmter Risiken geht. Während der eine Anbieter bei einer Vorerkrankung sofort ausschließt oder Zuschläge verlangt, akzeptiert ein anderer möglicherweise dieselben Angaben ohne Probleme. Das wirkt auf mich ziemlich unübersichtlich.

Ein Freund hat mir erzählt, dass man statt eines direkten Antrags auch eine sogenannte anonyme Risikovoranfrage stellen kann. Dadurch soll man vorab erfahren, wie die Versicherer reagieren würden, ohne dass dies gleich in irgendwelchen Datenbanken landet. Ich frage mich nun, ob das tatsächlich so funktioniert und wann dieser Weg wirklich sinnvoll ist.

Auch habe ich Bedenken, dass ein übereilter Antrag im schlimmsten Fall zu einer Ablehnung führt, die einem dann dauerhaft im Weg steht. Gerade bei langfristig wichtigen Verträgen wie der Berufsunfähigkeitsversicherung wäre das natürlich katastrophal. Gleichzeitig will ich nicht unnötig Zeit verlieren, weil ich ja möglichst bald abgesichert sein möchte.

Deshalb meine Frage an euch: Wann sollte man eine anonyme Risikovoranfrage stellen und wie läuft so etwas konkret ab?
29
PC-Games Forum / Re: Lieblings RTS-Game
« Letzter Beitrag von moye548 am 19. August 2025, 10:26:29 »
It sounds like your frustration stems from a common issue in sports management games: a "broken" meta-game where success relies on acquiring a few specific superstar players like Mbappé or Ronaldo, even for smaller clubs. This can make Employees use Employee ID the game feel unrealistic and repetitive. The best way to get your voice heard is to provide this feedback directly to the developers on the game's official forums or social media, as they often use this input to improve future updates and versions.
30
News / Re: [Patchday] Microsoft behebt sieben Probleme
« Letzter Beitrag von patterson123 am 19. August 2025, 07:16:34 »
That's not a bug, but a common aspect of how Blender's camera views work. The "jump" happens because **perspective view** mimics real-world depth, while **orthographic (flat) view** eliminates it for precise, 2D-like alignment. When you switch, Blender resets the camera's rotation to be perfectly aligned with an axis and re-centers the view on the last point you were orbiting. To manage this, use the **numpad keys** (1, 3, 7) for predictable flat views and press the **period (.) key** on the numpad to re-center the view on a selected object. foremostpayonline one time payment
Seiten: 1 [3] 5 6 7 8 9 10